I shall name her… Pointy-Bob! (Shrieks of anguish in the distance.)

Tried to go to the office, but failed due to being weak and feeble. Slept in a bit more then worked from home. Sage was extremely helpful.

Watched (live-action anime): One Piece 2.8: Yeah, fuck that guy anyway.  Anyway, end of Drum Island arc, but also end of the season. I hope it’s still doing well and Netflix doesn’t cancel it just to avoid paying the writers.

Read (from the shelf): FAIL.

Written (game design): 180:

It’s also less dramatic and more hitpointy to have most conditions be
tiny so we’re back to whittling down the enemy. But now it’s harder to
keep track of, so that’s not a win. Fewer more significant conditions
is both more interesting and easier to play. You can have a defense
that burns away the incoming Entangle or whatever, but it has to be a
technique you paid for specially, or else you have to spend an action
or some other resource to try to do it as a maneuver.

Does the same go for emotional attacks? They’re kind of like physical
attacks but with different conditions and ways to get rid of the
conditions, but tend to affect decisions rather than combat stats,
so even a minor one can be interesting. There’s also the difference
that if you remind someone of her lost mother to make her distracted
but then punch her, the condition is likely to disappear, or change
to “must clobber this jerk who punched her at a time of great
emotional vulnerability”. Also you can’t just take the action “bring
up the villain’s long-lost mother”, you have to figure out how that
ties into their emotional weakness, which has to be written up some
useful way on their character sheet, just like yours.

Speaking of weaknesses, which we postulated as being necessary to get
around the issue of an attacking 12d6 powerset mostly not doing much
against a defending 12d6 powerset, how do those work? How do you find
them, what do you roll to exploit them, is having your weakness
discovered a condition? Technically it only helps the people who know
about it, but we can presume everyone blabs about everything all the
time.

Or is it a positive condition on the people who know about it,
granting them extra power instead of nerfing the person with the
weakness? For something like knowing where the weak spot in someone’s
defenses is, that seems wrong, even if it worked out the same
mechanically (which it probably wouldn’t, since attacks roll and
defenses are flat). There might be other advantages that should be on
the attacker’s side, though, plus of course any buff would be a
positive condition, with ways to apply and remove and effects while
active.

Positive conditions have the same concerns as adjustment powers in
Hero, namely that we don’t want one buffer to make everyone else
unstoppable, or want to make it mandatory to spend ages buffing
before a fight to be competitive. This isn’t a computer game or D&D
3e, or even Ars Magica. Probably you can only boost someone’s
effective powerset level up to the level of the powerset you’re using
to boost, or a minimum boost of +1d6 if your level is at least half
theirs. Or something along those lines.